Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements & Housing

acash

Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements and Housing
ACASH

Document DownloadDownload
Document TypeGeneral
Publish Date23/07/2003
Author
Published ByNetherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
Edited BySaba Bilquis
Uncategorized

ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION OF LAND USE AND TRANSPORT STRATEGIES IN NETHERLANDS

Download Document
Document Type:General
Publish Date:2003
Primary Author:Karst T. Geurs, Bert van Wee
Edited By:Saba Bilquis
Published By:Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment

A review of accessibility measures is presented for assessing the usability of these measures in evaluations of land-use and transport strategies and developments. Accessibility measures are reviewed using a broad range of relevant criteria, including theoretical basis, interpretability and communicability, and data requirements of the measures. Accessibility impacts of land-use and transport strategies are often evaluated using accessibility measures, which researchers and policymakers can easily operationalize and interpret, such as traveling speed, but which generally do not satisfy theoretical criteria. More complex and disaggregated accessibility measures, however, increase complexity and the effort for calculations, and the difficulty of interpretation.

The current practice can be much improved by operationalizing more advanced location-based and utility-based accessibility measures that are still relatively easy to interpret for researchers and policy makers, and can be computed with state-of-the-practice data and/or land use and transport models. Research directions towards theoretically more advanced accessibility measures point towards the inclusion of individual’s spatial–temporal constraints and feedback mechanisms between accessibility, land-use and travel behavior. Furthermore, there is a need for theoretical and empirical research on relationships between accessibility, option values and non-user benefits, and the measurement of different components of accessibility.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *