Financialisation of housing in South Korea: State-sanctioned popular speculation on housing
The document titled “Financialisation of Housing in South Korea: State-sanctioned Popular Speculation on Housing” by Hwanhee Bae explores the significant transformation and financialisation of housing in South Korea, particularly following the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis.
This transformation has led to widespread speculation among households, driven by state policies that facilitate access to loans and promote short-term capital gains.
Introduction
Financialisation refers to the increasing dominance of financial motives, financial markets, actors, and institutions in the operation of domestic and international economies.
In South Korea, this phenomenon has been particularly pronounced in the housing sector, which has become a primary vehicle for wealth accumulation among households across various income levels.
The paper highlights that household debt in South Korea is alarmingly high, amounting to 105.8% of GDP and 206.5% of net disposable income, making it one of the highest levels globally1.
State Policies Facilitating Housing Speculation
The South Korean government has played a crucial role in fostering a housing market characterized by speculation. Two key mechanisms are identified: pre-sale of apartments and Jeonse rental agreements.
Pre-sale of Apartments
This system allows buyers to purchase apartments before they are completed, often requiring only a deposit while leveraging loans for the remainder, this is an important factor in financialisation of housing.
The pre-sale market has become a popular investment avenue, allowing households to engage in speculative behavior with relatively low initial capital outlay.
The state regulates this market, establishing rules that facilitate access to these investments while also collecting household savings through specific savings accounts known as Cheong-yak.
These funds are funneled into the National Housing and Urban Fund (NHUF), which supports housing development and provides loans back to households1.
Jeonse Rental System
The Jeonse system is another unique aspect of South Korea’s housing market.
In this arrangement, tenants pay a substantial deposit (typically 50-80% of the property’s value) instead of monthly rent, which is returned at the end of the lease period.
This deposit acts as an interest-free loan for landlords, who can invest it elsewhere. However, tenants often need to borrow money to afford these deposits, contributing to rising household debt levels.
Implications for Households
The paper argues that these systems have led to a culture of speculation among households that transcends traditional investment strategies.
Rather than focusing on long-term stability or fixed incomes, households are increasingly motivated by short-term capital gains from rising property values.
This shift has profound implications for social equity and economic stability, as those unable to participate in speculative investments may find themselves at a disadvantage1.
Economic Consequences
The financialisation of housing has created a feedback loop where easy access to credit fuels an asset bubble in real estate.
As housing prices escalate, households feel compelled to invest more heavily in property as a means of securing their financial futures.
This dynamic has led to concerns about economic vulnerability; should there be a downturn in the housing market or an increase in interest rates, many households could face significant financial distress34.
Conclusion
In summary, the financialisation of housing in South Korea represents a complex interplay between state policy and household behavior.
The government’s facilitation of speculative practices through mechanisms like pre-sales and Jeonse agreements has resulted in high levels of household debt and significant economic risks.
As South Korea continues to navigate this landscape, the balance between promoting home ownership and ensuring economic stability will be critical for future policy considerations and supporting financialisation of housing.
The findings presented by Hwanhee Bae underscore the need for careful examination of housing policies and their broader economic implications within the context of financialisation.
Also Read: Exploring Vulnerability in Urban Areas: Housing and Living Poverty in Seoul, South Korea