Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements & Housing

Document Download Download
Document Type General
Publish Date 09/11/2016
Author Updating by ACASH is in process
Published By FESSUD Working Paper
Edited By Suneela Farooqi
Uncategorized

Financialisation of Low-Cost Housing in South Africa

Commercialisation and Financialisation of Low-Cost Housing in South Africa

Introduction

The financialisation of low-cost housing in post-apartheid South Africa is a multifaceted phenomenon that has significantly shaped the country’s housing landscape. This paper delves into the commodification, commercialization, and financialisation of low-cost housing through the systems of provision (SOP) approach. This approach posits that sector outcomes are the result of interactions between various agents, all of which are embedded in historically evolved social and economic structures and processes. By examining the evolution of housing policy and the production and consumption dynamics, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the various agents and processes involved in the financialisation of low-cost housing.
Financialisation of Low-Cost Housing in South Africa
Discussion on financialisation of Low-Cost Housing in South Africa

The Systems of Provision Approach for Financialisation of Low-cost Housing

The systems of provision (SOP) approach is a theoretical framework that emphasizes the importance of understanding how different agents interact within a sector to produce outcomes. These agents include policymakers, financial institutions, developers, and consumers, among others. The SOP approach recognizes that these interactions are not isolated but are deeply embedded in the historical, social, and economic contexts of a given society. In the case of South Africa, the legacy of apartheid has had a profound impact on housing policy and the way low-cost housing is provided and consumed.

The Evolution of Housing Policy in South Africa

South Africa’s housing policy has undergone significant changes since the end of apartheid. The post-apartheid government inherited a deeply unequal housing landscape, with a large portion of the population living in inadequate housing conditions. In response, the government implemented various housing programs aimed at addressing this inequality. These programs included the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP) and the Breaking New Ground (BNG) policy, both of which sought to provide affordable housing to low-income households.
However, these policies were not without their challenges. The RDP, for instance, faced criticism for its top-down approach and the quality of housing provided. The BNG policy, on the other hand, emphasized the need for a more integrated and sustainable approach to housing provision. Despite these efforts, the financialisation of low-cost housing has continued to influence the way housing is produced and consumed in South Africa.

The Commodification and Commercialization of Low-Cost Housing

The commodification and commercialization of low-cost housing in South Africa have been driven by various factors, including the involvement of private developers and financial institutions. The shift towards market-oriented housing provision has led to the increased commodification of housing, where housing is treated as a commodity to be bought and sold rather than a basic human right. This has resulted in the proliferation of low-cost housing projects that prioritize profit over the needs of low-income households.
Commercialization has also played a significant role in shaping the housing market. Financial institutions have increasingly become involved in housing finance, providing loans and mortgages to homebuyers. This has led to the growth of the housing finance sector, but it has also introduced new risks and vulnerabilities. For instance, the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States demonstrated the potential for financial instability when housing finance is过度商业化.

The Financialisation of Low-Cost Housing

The financialization of low-cost housing refers to the increasing involvement of financial markets and institutions in the housing sector. This process has transformed housing from a social good to a financial asset, with significant implications for housing affordability and accessibility. Financial institutions have developed various financial instruments to invest in housing, such as mortgage-backed securities and real estate investment trusts (REITs). These instruments have attracted investors seeking high returns, further fueling the financialisation of the housing market.
The financialisation of low-cost housing has also led to the securitization of housing finance. Securitization involves the bundling of mortgages into financial products that are sold to investors. While this process has increased the availability of housing finance, it has also introduced new risks, such as the potential for housing bubbles and financial crises. The 2008 global financial crisis highlighted the dangers of excessive securitization and the need for stronger regulatory frameworks to prevent similar crises in the future.

The Role of Agents in the Financialisation Process

Various agents play crucial roles in the financialisation of low-cost housing in South Africa. Policymakers, for instance, have a significant influence on housing policy and the regulatory environment. Their decisions can either promote or hinder the financialisation process. Financial institutions, on the other hand, are key players in the provision of housing finance and the development of financial instruments. Developers also play a crucial role in the production of low-cost housing, often driven by market forces and profit potential.
Consumers, particularly low-income households, are also affected by the financialization of housing. They often face challenges in accessing affordable housing due to the increasing costs associated with housing finance. The involvement of financial institutions in housing finance has led to higher interest rates and stricter lending criteria, making it more difficult for low-income households to purchase homes.

Conclusion

The financialisation of low-cost housing in post-apartheid South Africa is a complex and multifaceted issue that involves various agents and processes. Through the systems of provision approach, this paper has explored the evolution of housing policy and the production and consumption dynamics in the housing sector. The commodification, commercialization, and financialisation of low-cost housing have significant implications for housing affordability and accessibility, particularly for low-income households. As South Africa continues to grapple with the challenges of providing adequate housing to its population, it is essential to consider the role of financialisation in shaping the housing landscape and developing policies that promote equitable and sustainable housing solutions.
For further reading on this topic, you can refer to the following external links:

Similar post on ACASH

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *