Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements & Housing

Document Download Download
Document Type General
Publish Date 11/02/2015
Author Merle Zwiers, Reinout Kleinhans, Maarten van Ham
Published By Institute for the Study of Labor, Delft University of Technology and IZA
Edited By Arslan Hassan
Uncategorized

Housing in the Netherlands – Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization

Housing in the Netherlands – Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization

Introduction

Housing in the Netherlands is a multifaceted issue that intertwines with the broader socio-economic fabric of the country. The Dutch housing market is characterized by a unique blend of social and private sectors, with a significant portion of the population residing in government-subsidized housing. This article delves into the intricacies of housing in the Netherlands, examining the socio-spatial dynamics, urban renewal programs, and the innovative approaches employed to address housing challenges.
Housing in the Netherlands - Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization

Socio-Spatial Dynamics and Polarization

There is increasing evidence that our societies are polarizing, with most studies focusing on labor market and educational outcomes. These studies reveal a socioeconomic polarization at the bottom and top ends of the population distribution. Processes of social polarization have a spatial dimension, which should be visible in the changing mosaic of neighborhoods in cities. Many studies treat neighborhoods as static entities, but urban researchers are now increasingly interested in neighborhood trajectories, moving away from point-in-time measures and enabling a close examination of processes of change.

Housing Market Overview

The Dutch housing market offers diverse options, catering to both short-term and long-term needs. Rental properties, ranging from compact studio apartments in city centers to spacious family homes in the suburbs, are popular for foreigners. Monthly rents for apartments in major cities like Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and Utrecht can vary greatly but often start at €1,200 for a one-bedroom. It’s essential to distinguish between rent-controlled and free-sector properties. Rent-controlled homes are government-regulated and have their rents determined by a point system, ensuring affordability. To qualify, one’s annual income must be below a certain threshold. On the other hand, free-sector homes are not bound by these restrictions, and their rents are typically higher.

Social Housing

Approximately 30% of the Netherlands’ national housing stock is social housing. This percentage is higher in big cities like Amsterdam, where nearly 50% of housing is social housing. Rent in social housing is determined by a points system, where points are awarded based on the size and amenities of the property. The number of points determines the rent of the property, with a higher number of points translating to higher rent. Local housing associations are responsible for setting a maximum rent for social housing each year. In addition, 80% of social housing must be rented to households that fall below a certain income threshold. 20% of available social housing must be available for households with two tiers of higher income thresholds. These income thresholds are adjusted yearly.

Private Housing

The private housing market in the Netherlands is called free-sector housing. Unlike social housing, there is no cap on rent, no cap on increases in rent, and no point system for determining home value. Owner-occupied homes in the free-sector consist of approximately 60% of the national housing stock, privately owned rental homes make up 8% of housing stock, and the remaining 32% are government-owned rental homes. In contrast, 65% of homes in the US are owner-occupied.

Public-Private Partnerships

The Netherlands utilizes a private-public partnership (PPP) to expand housing affordability. PPPs require both the government and private companies to invest financial resources and expertise in a development project. Co-investment on projects is more cost-effective and lowers risk for both investors. Additionally, PPPs allow the government to complete projects more quickly and efficiently than projects funded by the government alone.

VINEX Housing Program

Between 1995 and 2005, the VINEX housing program increased housing stock in the Netherlands by 7.6% by producing 450,000 homes. The project was a combined effort of national, regional, and municipal governments to expand housing around populous cities in locations that were accessible by public transportation. Land acquisition and infrastructure costs were subsidized by the Dutch Central government and new neighborhoods were built with sustainability in mind. Many neighborhoods feature open canals and waterways to collect run-off, incorporate outdoor spaces and parks, and are designed to promote walking and biking.

Opzoomeren Policy

Opzoomeren involves initiatives such as street festivals, Dutch language classes for immigrants, and the creation of community rules which reduce conflict. The Opzoomeren policy began in Rotterdam, a city heavily populated by migrants, as a city-wide policy. Initially organized by citizens to improve integration and connection in their communities, it has since spread throughout the Netherlands as a national policy. Actions are initiated by the community and may be funded or by the municipality if the project is successful. The Opzoomeren policy has successfully bridged cultural gaps in neighborhoods that are ethnically, socio-economically, and generationally diverse.

Urban Renewal Programs and Longitudinal Neighbourhood Change

Urban renewal programs in the Netherlands have long been a subject of debate. This paper offers a first empirical application of sequence analysis combined with a tree-structured discrepancy analysis. This paper contributes to the debate on urban renewal programs by offering a unique viewpoint on longitudinal neighborhood change. Our findings show a clear pattern of socio-spatial polarization in Dutch cities, raising questions about the effects of area-based policies and the importance of path-dependency.

Conclusion

Housing in the Netherlands is a complex issue that requires a nuanced understanding of socio-spatial dynamics, urban renewal programs, and the innovative approaches employed to address housing challenges. The Dutch housing market, characterized by a unique blend of social and private sectors, offers diverse options catering to different needs. The socio-spatial polarization in Dutch cities highlights the importance of area-based policies and the need for sustainable, integrated neighborhoods. The Netherlands serves as an example of how public housing can be effectively integrated among higher income households to create more diverse, accepting neighborhoods.

External Links

Similar post on ACASH

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *