Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements & Housing

Document Download Download
Document Type General
Publish Date 15/06/2013
Author Gautam Bhan
Published By Economic & Political Weekly
Edited By Saba Bilquis
Uncategorized

Housing and the ‘Failure’ of Planning in Delhi: 1947-2010

Housing and the ‘Failure’ of Planning in Delhi: 1947-2010

Introduction

The document “Housing and the ‘Failure’ of Planning in Delhi: 1947-2010” by Gautam Bhan critically examines the urban planning landscape in Delhi, arguing that the chaos seen in urban development is not merely a failure of planning but rather a direct outcome of the planning processes themselves. The paper discusses how planning has influenced housing production and urban governance, highlighting several key themes.

Planning in Delhi
Housing and the ‘Failure’ of Planning in Delhi

Urban Development and Planning Failures

Bhan contends that the narratives surrounding the “failure” of planning are not just critiques but are intertwined with the very concept of planning itself. Accusations of chaos, incompetence, and exclusion reveal deeper issues within the understanding and execution of urban planning in Delhi. The paper questions how diverse stakeholders have reached a consensus on the notion of planning failure and what this implies for future urban policy and practice aimed at creating equitable cities.

Housing Production and Settlement Patterns

Focusing specifically on housing, Bhan analyzes data from the Delhi Economic Survey 2008-09, which indicates that only 24% of the city’s population resided in “planned colonies” as of 2000. This statistic raises critical questions about what constitutes “planned” versus “unplanned” housing. The author explores how these categories are defined and constructed, noting that many areas classified as unplanned are actually products of formal planning processes that failed to meet the housing needs of residents.

The Role of Master Plans

The paper discusses Delhi’s master plans issued since 1962, emphasizing the gaps between planned intentions and actual housing developments. Bhan uses geospatial maps to illustrate these discrepancies, showing that what is envisioned in plans often does not materialize on the ground. He argues that planning does not exert control over urban development; instead, it shapes spatial patterns even in areas deemed unplanned.

Illegality as Governance

Bhan introduces the concept of illegality as a form of spatial governance, suggesting that unauthorized colonies emerged as a response to inadequate formal housing options. He highlights how these colonies often occupy land designated as rural or undeveloped by master plans, complicating their status within urban governance frameworks. The paper outlines three major waves of regularization for unauthorized colonies, showing how these processes reflect broader failures in planning.

Housing Shortfalls and Economic Disparities

The document also addresses significant shortfalls in housing availability, particularly for economically weaker sections (EWS). The Master Plan Delhi (MPD) 2021 estimates a shortfall of 400,000 housing units, with 88% affecting EWS populations. Bhan critiques the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for prioritizing middle- and higher-income housing while neglecting affordable options for lower-income residents.

Historical Context and Future Implications

Bhan contextualizes these issues within a historical framework, examining how past planning decisions have shaped current realities. He argues that understanding planning in Delhi failures requires acknowledging their historical legacies and recognizing their ongoing impact on urban life. This perspective invites a re-evaluation of what constitutes effective urban governance and planning practices.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Bhan’s analysis presents a nuanced view of urban planning in Delhi, challenging conventional narratives of failure. By framing chaos as an outcome of planning rather than its absence, he calls for a critical reassessment of planning practices that can lead to more equitable urban environments. The paper advocates for an inclusive approach to urban politics that acknowledges diverse forms of habitation and seeks to address systemic inequalities in housing provision.This comprehensive examination reveals that addressing the failures of planning requires not only practical solutions but also a fundamental shift in how planners understand their roles within complex urban systems.

Also Read: Affordable and Safe Housing for Single Mothers in Japan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *