Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements & Housing

Document Download Download
Document Type General
Publish Date 27/09/2024
Author Afrodete
Published By Afrodete
Edited By Ayesha
Uncategorized

Social Area versus Private Space: Exploring Interior Layout Approaches in Tehran’s Current Housing (A Case Study of District 9 Residential Units, Tehran, Iran)

Social Area versus Private Space: Exploring Interior Layout Approaches in Tehran's Current HousingThe document titled “Social Area versus Private Space: Exploring Interior Layout Approaches in Tehran’s Current Housing – A Case Study of District 9 Residential Units, Tehran, Iran” investigates the distribution of social and private spaces within residential units in District 9 of Tehran. It aims to understand how these spatial arrangements reflect broader socio-cultural dynamics and impact the quality of life for residents.

Introduction

Tehran, the capital of Iran, faces significant challenges related to housing due to rapid urbanization and population growth. The study focuses on District 9, characterized by its dense urban fabric and a mix of new and historical buildings. The district is undergoing transformation, with many older structures being replaced by modern apartment complexes. This research examines how interior layouts prioritize social areas—such as living rooms and dining spaces—over private spaces like bedrooms.

Methodology

The study employs a quantitative analysis of interior floor plans from various residential units in District 9. It assesses the proportion of space allocated to social areas versus private areas, excluding kitchens from the analysis. The research involved extensive correspondence with municipal authorities to gather data on residential units, highlighting the challenges of accessing information about private interiors.

Key Findings

Space Distribution

The findings reveal that social areas occupy an average of 45% of the total space in residential units, while private bedrooms account for only 25%. This trend persists across both smaller and larger units, suggesting a systemic preference for communal living spaces. In many cases, bedroom sizes approach or fall below the legally mandated minimum dimensions, reflecting a compromise on private space to enhance social functionality.

Impact of Unit Size

The study categorizes residential units based on size, noting that those smaller than 75 m² tend to have a more balanced distribution between social and private spaces due to adherence to regulations. However, larger units often exhibit an even greater emphasis on social areas at the expense of privacy. This imbalance raises questions about the suitability of current housing designs for fostering both community interaction and individual privacy.

Other Interior Spaces

The research also examines how other interior spaces—such as bathrooms and corridors—contribute to the overall functionality of homes. It finds that these areas are often minimized in size or designed primarily to support social activities rather than personal needs. This layout may lead to a situation where homes serve predominantly as venues for social gatherings rather than as private sanctuaries.

Socio-Cultural Implications

The prioritization of social over private space reflects broader socio-cultural dynamics in Tehran. The design choices may stem from cultural norms that value communal living and social interaction. However, this can also lead to challenges for residents seeking personal space and privacy in their homes. The study suggests that these spatial configurations can significantly influence residents’ quality of life, impacting their well-being and sense of security.

Recommendations for Design Guidelines

Based on the findings, the study proposes several design guidelines aimed at improving the balance between social and private spaces in residential units:

  • Incorporate Adequate Private Areas: Future housing designs should ensure that bedrooms meet minimum size requirements while also providing adequate personal space.
  • Flexible Layouts: Encourage flexible interior layouts that allow residents to adapt spaces according to their needs, promoting both social interaction and privacy.
  • Community Engagement: Involve local communities in the design process to better understand their needs and preferences regarding spatial arrangements.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on the current state of housing design in Tehran’s District 9, highlighting the tension between social and private spaces within residential units. As urbanization continues to reshape Tehran’s landscape, it is essential for architects and planners to consider these dynamics carefully. By addressing the balance between communal living and individual privacy, future housing developments can contribute more effectively to residents’ overall quality of life while respecting cultural values. The insights gained from this research can inform policy-making and architectural practices aimed at creating more livable urban environments in Tehran and beyond.

Further reading:
[PDF] Exploring Interior – Layout Approaches in Tehran’s Current Housing athensjournals
[PDF] Secondary Spaces of Entrance, Corridor, and Balcony in Tehran … athensjournals

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *