An Introduction to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Updated February 27, 2019
Introduction
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) is one of the most significant federal programs aimed at addressing the shortage of affordable housing in the United States. Established by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the LIHTC program incentivizes private investment in the development and preservation of affordable rental housing for low-income households. Over the years, it has become the primary tool for financing affordable housing, producing millions of units since its inception.
How the LIHTC Program Works
The LIHTC program operates by providing tax credits to developers of qualified affordable housing projects. These tax credits are then sold to investors, typically corporations, to raise equity capital for the construction or rehabilitation of rental housing. In exchange, investors receive a reduction in their federal tax liability over a 10-year period. This mechanism allows developers to secure funding without relying solely on traditional debt financing, making it financially feasible to offer rents at below-market rates.
The program is administered by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) but is implemented at the state level. Each year, the IRS allocates tax credits to state housing finance agencies (HFAs) based on population. These agencies are responsible for distributing the credits to developers through a competitive application process. States must develop Qualified Allocation Plans (QAPs) outlining their priorities and criteria for awarding credits, ensuring alignment with local housing needs and goals.
Types of LIHTCs: 9% and 4% Credits
There are two types of LIHTCs: the 9% credit and the 4% credit. The names refer to the approximate percentage of eligible project costs that developers can claim annually over the 10-year credit period.
- 9% Credits: These are highly competitive and are typically awarded to new construction projects or substantial rehabilitation efforts that do not use federal subsidies. The 9% credit covers a larger portion of project costs, making it a critical resource for developers.
- 4% Credits: These are often used for projects involving the acquisition of existing buildings or those that receive other federal subsidies, such as tax-exempt bonds. While less generous than the 9% credit, the 4% credit still plays a vital role in preserving affordable housing stock.
Eligibility and Compliance Requirements
To qualify for LIHTCs, developers must commit to renting a portion of their units to low-income households at restricted rents for a minimum of 30 years. Specifically, at least 20% of the units must be affordable to households earning 50% or less of the area median income (AMI), or 40% of the units must be affordable to households earning 60% or less of the AMI. Rents are capped at 30% of the designated income level, ensuring affordability.
Developers must also comply with strict program rules throughout the 15-year compliance period, which includes the 10-year credit period and an additional 5 years of monitoring. Failure to meet these requirements can result in the recapture of tax credits, creating significant financial risks for investors and developers alike.
The Role of Investors and Syndicators
Investors, often large corporations, play a crucial role in the LIHTC program. They provide the upfront capital needed to finance affordable housing projects in exchange for the tax credits. Because the credits are claimed over 10 years, investors typically work with syndicators—intermediaries who pool investments from multiple sources and manage the allocation of credits. Syndicators also ensure compliance with program requirements, reducing risks for investors.
The demand for LIHTCs from investors is driven by their value in offsetting federal tax liabilities. However, the market for these credits can fluctuate based on changes in corporate tax rates, economic conditions, and investor appetite for tax-advantaged investments.
Benefits of the LIHTC Program
The Low-Income Housing Tax Creditprogram has been widely praised for its effectiveness in addressing the affordable housing crisis. By leveraging private capital, it reduces the need for direct federal subsidies while still producing high-quality housing for low-income families. The program has also spurred economic activity by creating jobs in construction and property management and by revitalizing distressed neighborhoods.
Moreover, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program has fostered partnerships between public and private entities, encouraging collaboration among developers, investors, state agencies, and local communities. This collaborative approach has led to innovative solutions for affordable housing challenges, such as mixed-income developments and the integration of supportive services for vulnerable populations.
Challenges and Criticisms
Despite its successes, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program is not without its challenges. One major criticism is the complexity of the program, which can create barriers for smaller developers and nonprofit organizations. The competitive application process, coupled with the need for significant upfront capital, often favors larger, more experienced developers.
Another concern is the geographic distribution of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit-funded projects. Critics argue that the program has not always targeted areas with the greatest need, leading to concentrations of affordable housing in low-income neighborhoods rather than in high-opportunity areas with better access to jobs, schools, and services. Efforts to address this issue have included changes to state QAPs to prioritize projects in high-opportunity areas and the creation of incentives for mixed-income developments.
Additionally, the program’s reliance on private investors makes it vulnerable to shifts in the tax credit market. For example, reductions in corporate tax rates, such as those enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, have reduced the value of tax credits, leading to decreased investment in affordable housing. This has prompted calls for reforms to stabilize the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit market and ensure a steady flow of capital.
Recent Developments and Future Outlook
In recent years, there has been growing recognition of the need to expand and strengthen the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program to meet the increasing demand for affordable housing. Proposals for reform have included increasing the allocation of tax credits, simplifying compliance requirements, and enhancing targeting mechanisms to ensure that resources are directed to areas with the greatest need.
The COVID-19 pandemic has further highlighted the importance of affordable housing, as millions of Americans faced housing instability due to job losses and economic uncertainty. In response, policymakers have explored temporary measures to support the LIHTC program, such as lowering the “50% test” threshold for 4% credit projects and providing additional funding for affordable housing initiatives.
Looking ahead, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program is likely to remain a cornerstone of federal affordable housing policy. However, its continued success will depend on addressing existing challenges, adapting to changing economic conditions, and fostering innovation in the development and preservation of affordable housing.
Conclusion
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit has proven to be a powerful tool for expanding access to affordable housing in the United States. By leveraging private investment and fostering public-private partnerships, the program has produced millions of affordable rental units, benefiting low-income families and communities across the country. While challenges remain, the LIHTC program’s flexibility and effectiveness make it a critical component of efforts to address the nation’s affordable housing crisis. As policymakers and stakeholders work to refine and strengthen the program, the LIHTC will continue to play a vital role in ensuring that all Americans have access to safe, decent, and affordable housing.
Also Read: The Possibilities of a Housing First Paradigm Shift in Hungary