Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements & Housing

acash

Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements and Housing
ACASH

Document DownloadDownload
Document Type
Publish Date
Author
Published By
Edited By
Uncategorized

Global – Urban Public Housing Strategies in Developing Countries

Universally, the production, maintenance and management of housing have been, and continue to be, market based activities. Nevertheless, since the mid- twentieth century virtually all governments, socialist and liberal alike, have perceived the need to intervene in urban housing markets in support of low-income households who are denied access to the established (private sector) housing market by their lack of financial resources. This paper examines the range of strategic policy alternatives, employed by state housing agencies to this end. They range from public sector entry into the urban housing market through the direct construction of (‘conventional’) ‘public housing’ that is let or transferred to low-income beneficiaries at sub-market rates, to the provision of financial supports (subsidies) and other non-financial incentives to private sector producers and consumers of urban housing, and to the administration of (‘non-conventional’) programmes of social, technical and legislative supports that enable the production, maintenance and management of socially acceptable housing at prices and costs that are affordable to low income urban households and communities. It concludes with a brief review of the direction that public housing policies have been taking at the start of the twenty first century and reflects on “where next”, making a distinction between ‘public housing’ and ‘social housing’ strategies. Housing production was clearly seen as an engineering function and so, for civil staff, public housing production was the responsibility, and a minor activity of departments or ministries of public works. Its management was confined to routine maintenance and the administration of allocation procedures. Governments’ intervention in the housing provision of the vast majority of citizens was confined to attempts to control private sector initiative in the interests of public health, safety and amenity by imposing standards that many low-income households could not afford to meet, and many city governments could not enforce.

More….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *